wellcom to Auto/Motor Cars Space!

显示标签为“Test Drive”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Test Drive”的博文。显示所有博文

2009 VW Jetta TDI Road Test: Turbocharged Torque

Torque is described as a force that tends to turn things and, in the case of the 2009 Jetta TDI, its abundance turned me into a fan of this latest in a long line of Volkswagen "oil-burners" by providing strong performance and flexibility along with exceptionally high levels of fuel economy.

Torque is what you get when you, for example, tug on the handle of a wrench to tighten or loosen a nut. Doing so exerts a twisting force still expressed here, in Ye Olde English, in lb-ft, as nobody on this side of the Atlantic has any idea what a newton-metre is.

Torque in an engine is generated by burning a fuel/air mixture in a cylinder, with the pressure of the expanding gases pushing the piston, which is linked to the crankshaft by a connecting rod, downwards.

As this occurs, the angle generated by the crankshaft "throw" increases and the rod, like the wrench handle above, rotates the crank. And that, with a few things such as clutches and transmission gears in between, is what makes your car move.

The Jetta TDI, with its turbocharged diesel engine, does this with a degree of vigour, accompanied by a high degree of overall flexibility not normally experienced in the compact-car category. Most small-displacement gasoline engines don't produce a lot of torque, and what they do is generated at higher engine speeds.

The TDI's four-cylinder engine delivers a disproportionate (for its displacement) amount of low rpm "grunt" that lets it charge off the line like a V-6 but also maintains that strong pulling power at highway speeds.

This allows it to coast along at minimal revs in top gear while sipping fuel at such a frugal rate that 1,000 km per tank wouldn't be an unlikely achievement. In fact, the number on the trip computer that estimates how much distance I had before needing more gas disconcertingly went up for the first hundred kilometres or so that I drove the car.

The TDI's arrival last year marked the return of the popular diesel engine option to the VW lineup in North America — it hadn't been able to sell a diesel here in 2007 due to U.S. emission standards — and the Jetta range now offers three engine choices, each of which gives the car a different driving character.

There's a gasoline-fuelled, 2.5-litre, four-cylinder that makes 177 hp at 5,700 rpm and 177 lb-ft of torque peaking at 4,250 rpm. With six-speed automatic transmission, it delivers very good performance and fuel economy ratings of 10.5 L/100 km city and 7.2 highway.

Also available is a performance-oriented, gas-burning, turbocharged 2.0-litre unit rated at 200 hp at 5,100 rpm and 207 lb-ft of torque from 1,700-5,000 rpm. This makes the 2.0 TSI Jetta a very quick car indeed and, thanks to the turbo, produces plenty of torque over that wide rpm range, which helps it garner very good fuel economy ratings of 9.0 city and 6.8 highway.

The 2.0-litre, four-cylinder diesel engine in the TDI delivers the least power, 140 hp at 4,000 rpm, but the most torque, 236 lb-ft, all of which is available from 1,750 to 2,500 rpm. Its fuel economy ratings are 6.8 city and 4.9 highway. The on-board readout was showing an average of 7.1 L/100 km when I returned it.

The "oil burner" appellation used above is in reference to the bad old days of low-powered and stinky diesel engines. This new one makes 40 hp more than the previous 1.9-litre unit and burns ultra-low-sulphur diesel very efficiently and cleanly and is also quieter.

And the direct shift gearbox (DSG) is a treat, snapping off lightning-quick shifts automatically or allowing you to select gears yourself. Although it takes a while to get used to the fact that it only revs to about 4,500 rpm between the gears, acceleration is surprisingly strong.

And its direct steering, firm suspension and good brakes also contribute to making it a very enjoyable car to drive.

The Jetta TDI is available in base manual transmission Trendline form at $24,275, in Comfortline trim at $26,775 and Highline versions go for $29,775. Our DSG-transmission-equipped tester had a sticker price of $31,175 and an all-in-but-the-taxes cost of $33,510. By comparison, a base gasoline Jetta 2.5 goes for $21,975 and a base 2.0 TSI for $27,475.

The base TDI comes with the usual features at this price, plus cruise control, climate control, 16-inch wheels, exterior temp gauge, a single CD audio system and front, side and side-curtain airbag systems.

The Comfortline has some extra chrome trim, a power-reclining driver's seat, heated seats, leather-wrapped wheel and a premium six-disc audio system. The Highline adds a compass, leather upholstery, a multi-function wheel, a sunroof and a rear armrest/pass-through.
In typical VW fashion, the interior is designed to meet more utilitarian than utopian standards for style. There's rather-uninspired plastic aplenty, not only where you can see it but also feel it — the surprisingly nasty and hard-edged door pull, for example.

The somewhat stark look and feel is ameliorated by stitched padding on the armrests, rather-nice mesh-finish aluminum trim and thin aluminum bezels around the gauges that perk up the plainness a bit.

The cabin is quiet enough at highway speeds, the leather-clad front seats are supportive and comfortable, the rear seat will handle two in comfort, headroom is good front and rear and the trunk capacity is fine at 400 litres.

In fact, if I had to cover a lot of mileage on an annual basis, I'd be happy to do it in the TDI, and would likely save some money if I kept doing it long enough. But the potent 2.0 TSI turbo's fuel economy numbers are pretty good, too, and it would still be my choice among the Jetta triad.

2010 Ford Mustang GT Road Test

A Mustang with a Track pack?

Corvettes and Vipers grab the glory for Old Glory at temples of speed such as Le Mans. The lumbering, log-axle Mustang is just a quarter-miler for the tattoo-and-tobacco crowd, right?

Actually, mes amis, the Mustang is America’s other road-racing workhorse. It has its own pro series, the eight-race Mustang Challenge. And there were more than a dozen Mustangs on the grid at Daytona this past January when a Roush-prepared Mustang finished second in the three-hour Koni Challenge race. It made all its rights and lefts better than Porsche 911s and BMW M3s.

No, we wouldn’t expect that hierarchy to hold on the street, even if the 2010 Track-pack Mustang GT is billed as the hairpin-and-carousel king of the newly reskinned Mustang lineup. Still, Ford’s old pony has a long history of making incremental improvements as it ages, and the Track package shows that the late-night lights still burn in some windows at Ford.

Building a Track-pack Mustang on the order form starts with a GT Premium and its 315-hp, 4.6-liter V-8 and five-speed manual, for $31,845. The $1495 Track package swaps out the 3.31 or 3.55 axle for a 3.73 limited-slip rear end with carbon friction plates. The shocks are less forgiving in both compression and rebound, the anti-roll bars are thicker, and dual-piston front brake calipers with performance pads from the 2009 Bullitt model do the stopping. Also, the stability-control system is retuned to tolerate more sideways play.

Finally, some very expensive Pirelli P Zero summer tires are fitted with white gloves. The size is 255/40ZR-19. The replacement price at Tire Rack: $398. Each. Avoid parking in dark alleys.
Off to the track we marched, taking along a standard Mustang GT rolling on its Pirelli P Zero Nero all-season tires for comparison. The results were illuminating.

Besides new sheetmetal, all 2010 Mustangs are recalibrated for less squish, less wiggle, less pogo, and less teeter-totter in the turns. Lay on the Track-pack version, and the strings are pulled even tauter.

The body isn’t allowed to slump to the outside as much. Helm response quickens, and corner placement gets finer. The sticky Pirellis earn their tariff, maintaining a gummy, squeal-free grip that keeps the front end carving smooth arcs.











Mustang steering has always been numb, and the Track pack doesn’t force any more circulation into it. Don’t bring along a Miata, as we did, or you’ll just get depressed. The Mustang’s flat seats allow you to flop around—we had knee bruises at day’s end—and the brake pedal started melting after a few laps, requiring frequent cool-downs.

At $33,340 before discounts, a Mustang GT with the Track package stampedes into territory prowled by the Nissan 370Z, among others. Some would say, “So what?” More is at issue than test numbers cavorting on paper. The Mustang is America, Manifest Destiny rolling on radials. Lining it up next to a Z—we did it once, back in 2002—is like serving sashimi with succotash.

And the Mustang is as fun as firecrackers on the Fourth. Everything is oversized and executed at volume 11, from the broad sweep of the double-hump dash to the big-grab shifter to the Yankee roar of the V-8 getting to 60 mph in 5.1 seconds.

It’s easy to be fast and pitch it sideways in a drift. And a sport mode in the new-for-2010 stability control allows a little more hooliganism within the safety net.

The quality is better for 2010, especially inside, where stitched panels on the doors and tighter-fitting, squishable plastics have relieved the gloom of cheapness in the previous model. But curses were muttered when the jagged splinter of an indifferently applied spot weld in the trunk tore an expensive down comforter. A Friday build, perhaps?

Though freeway ride suffers some with the Track package, Mustang fans who prefer candy-cane curbs to Christmas trees get a lot more control of their fillies. And for not much extra cabbage.

2009 BMW 750i 400HP Twin-Turbo Road Test

Just like a kid writing a 10th-grade term paper, the 2009 BMW 750i is just begging to mention the guy who said, "The successful revolutionary is a statesman, the unsuccessful one a criminal." In other words, one man's Thomas Jefferson is another's Guy Fawkes.

After being flamed with criticisms of its Bangle-butt styling and infernal iDrive controller, the last-generation BMW 7 Series seemed to be a shoo-in for criminal indictment. When this model was introduced back in 2002, car enthusiasts gathered with pitchforks in hand, carrying effigies of BMW chief designer Chris Bangle and yammering about an honored automotive brand being besmirched by styling blasphemy and misguided technological wizardry.

And yet the E63 has sold better than any of the three previous generations of the 7 Series, while both its controversial rear-end styling and iDrive control interface sprouted in copycat form all over the automotive landscape. Whatever you might say, the 2002-'08 BMW 7 Series has been undeniably successful — a revolutionary, not a criminal.

But like Thomas Jefferson, revolutionaries must move on and mellow through time. The all-new 2009 BMW 750i does just that, presenting a more enlightened approach to the full-size luxury flagship. The 2009 7 Series is quite simply one of the finest automobiles made today — no pitchforks needed.

Good-Bye, Bangle Butt; Hello, Habib Nose
The 2002 BMW 7 Series will be remembered for its Bangle butt — the curiously shelflike trunk lid and down-turned rear corners from Chris Bangle's design team that helped disguise the car's dramatic increase in overall height compared to the previous generation and the high, turbulence-reducing trunk that was required.

Meanwhile, the 2009 BMW 750i will go down for its Habib nose, the enormous, vertical, kidney-shape grilles on the front of the new car that come from the 7 Series design team led by Karim Habib, a response to new European standards of safety for pedestrian impacts. It's an imposing new face for BMW's flagship, yet it seems appropriate. It's the most controversial element on a car that is otherwise tasteful, yet visually interesting, paying just enough attention to classic BMW cues as it establishes new ones.












It all adorns a body incredibly similar in size to the car it replaces, as if the engineering furniture has been only slightly rearranged. Compared to the E63, the F01 7 Series has an additional inch of length, the same exact width, 0.3 inch less height and a 3.0-inch shorter wheelbase. Though the structure is lighter (and 20 percent more rigid), than before, this 4,599-pound car is 113 pounds heavier than the last 750i we tested. The result, in any case, is a big sedan replaced by a big sedan.

Only the lankiest of long-legged drivers will impinge upon the legs of the rear-seat occupants, who occupy a supremely comfortable backseat virtually identical in size to its predecessor. If space should indeed be an issue, the 750Li adds 5.5 inches of wheelbase for a limolike backseat. By comparison, a Mercedes-Benz S-Class falls in between these two body styles of the new 7 Series.











Smaller Is Bigger
The deck lid might read 750i, but under the hood resides a 4,395cc V8 with a pair of turbos sandwiched in between cylinder banks that hums to the tune of 400 horsepower at 5,500 rpm and 450 pound-feet of torque at 1,800 rpm. That's more torque than pumped out by the former V12 (an engine that hasn't been ruled out for eventual application in this new car, by the way), yet it's delivered in a remarkably no-fuss manner that's very like a V12.

Almost like a supercharged Jaguar V8, the 2009 BMW 750i's twin-turbo V8 whisks you up on a quiet wave of thrust best described as civilized hooliganism. There's no chest-thumping roar, no wild exhaust histrionics, no hint of the turbos spinning away under the sculpted hood.

Instead, the 750i quietly pins you into its double-articulated seatback on its way to 60 mph in 5.2 seconds (or 4.9 seconds with 1 foot of rollout as on a drag strip). That's about a second quicker than the S550 and old 750i, and just as quick as the S63 AMG that costs $37,000 more. Oh, and this engine also orchestrates a spectacular burnout.

Should you unfortunately have to stop, the new 7 Series comes to a halt from 60 mph in 112 feet with no drama, no fade and a consistent pedal every time.











More Choices Than Cheesecake Factory
How that effortless wave of thrust is called upon depends on the Driving Dynamics Control, the most elaborate, driver-adjustable tool for chassis setup that you've ever seen. Throttle sensitivity, transmission shift characteristics, steering effort, suspension damping and stability control are adjustable via settings for Comfort, Normal, Sport and Sport Plus. Adjustment of throttle action makes the biggest difference in the way the car behaves; the adjustment of suspension makes the smallest difference, as it's always supple.

DDC sounds complicated, but it allows the 2009 BMW 750i to better appeal to a greater number of drivers. In fact, you can break down Sport mode into chassis-only (steering and suspension) or drivetrain-only (throttle and six-speed automatic transmission), although we wished each DDC aspect could be individually selectable for an even more personalized driving cocktail. That's just nitpicking, though, as is the fact that the car defaults back to Normal or Comfort at startup in order to promote fuel-efficiency.

While only enthusiasts usually opt for a Sport package on a BMW, the example we found on our 750i test car is a must for anyone. Its rear-wheel steering (Integral Active Steering) allows this long luxury sedan to whip itself around hairpins or U-turn into tighter parking spaces better than much smaller cars. At low speeds, the rear wheels turn opposite the fronts for improved maneuverability, while they turn in the same direction at highway speeds for better stability. All the rage among Japanese GT cars of the early 1990s, four-wheel steering might finally be ready for prime time.

At the track, the 2009 BMW 750i and its engineering bag of tricks managed to snake through the slalom at a truly remarkable 66 mph — 3 mph faster than the Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG. It circled the skid pad at 0.84g, displaying impressive balance and communication. Quite simply, a car this big should not be cornering like this.

While the 7 Series has always felt at speed as if it had shrunk to a smaller, more agile size around you, this fifth-generation car with the Sport package feels like it was thrown into a hot dryer. The big car's steering isn't as tactile as that of a 5 Series, but as a sport limo, it's hard to fault its effort or feel in Sport mode. Comfort is a different matter, though, as it delivers too much play on-center.













Stop the Presses. We Like iDrive
For the past decade, the word "iDrive" has been greeted with the same sort of response usually reserved for "Detroit vacation." No more.

While the original knob-and-screen interface was indeed revolutionary for its solution to an overload of dash buttons, it was terribly flawed. The latest edition borrows innovations since introduced by competitors and also builds upon the iDrive fixes BMW has added over the years. Buttons have been installed around the controller for quicker access to frequently used functions, and we found them to be more intuitive to use than Audi's similar MMI layout. The iDrive screen itself is more attractively integrated into the dash and features more logically arranged menus. Graphics are also nicer, especially the navigation system map, which now features a bird's-eye topographical perspective.

One of iDrive's biggest problems was that too many functions were put under its fussy jurisdiction. Now liberated are eight preset buttons on the center stack, separate climate controls (now with a BMW-first dual-zone sync function) and a toggle button on the steering wheel for selecting radio stations.
A Metaphorical Statesman Fit for Literal Statesman
The rest of the big BMW's cabin is an exquisite blend of highest-quality luxury materials and eye-catching design. A leatherlike material covers the dash and door tops, with stitching that adds a handmade touch. The glossy wood trim is classy and gracefully wraps itself around the cabin.

The standard "Comfort" seats are just as advertised, with heating, cooling and an almost absurd range of adjustability that includes side bolsters and lumbar support. Whether slicing through a canyon road or escaping to Vegas for the weekend, the driver seat will cosset its occupant's butt like few others. In fact, it comes with a butt massage feature that alternates pressure between each cheek. (We're all for an intimacy between car and driver, but this is probably going a tad too far.)
A $90,000 Bargain
Most of us who drove the 2009 BMW 750i came away thinking we'd driven an even more expensive car. Upon hearing our tester rang in at "only" $89,870, the 7 Series started to seem like a bargain given its eye-popping performance, car-shrinking handling and a cabin that beautifully blends technology and luxury. It rates with the Mercedes-Benz S63 AMG at a price tag less than a Mercedes S550.

While the last 7 Series certainly impressed, its visually challenging styling and exasperating interior functionality made it difficult to desire. The all-new 750i, on the other hand, is well on its way to making a place for itself among our favorite cars. What was once a ragged revolutionary is now an honored statesman.

2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS Road Test

The arrival of the Chevy Camaro finally completes Detroit’s pony-car trifecta. Does the Reborn Ponycar Live Up to Its Name?

Since the last pill-shaped F-body Camaro rolled off the line in 2002, the long-fought, often contentious pony-car game has been one of solitaire, played solely by the Ford Mustang.

The Mustang went all retro in 2005, and the ensuing craze prompted Dodge and Chevy to rouse their own dormant nameplates (and fans) to take on the foe-less leader. Dodge was first in 2008 with its resurrected Challenger, and now—just as Ford is launching its significantly updated 2010 Mustang—Chevrolet has finally commenced production of its reborn Camaro, completing the new-age pony-car trifecta.

While we will save the official comparison test for later, we can aver that the neo Camaro offers the freshest and most modern package of the three. Built as it is on GM’s superb Zeta full-size platform, it sports a fully independent suspension, along with evocative, contemporary styling that thankfully misses being totally retro.

We entered into this first test of the long-awaited 2010 Camaro with high expectations. Indeed, with a 304-hp, 3.6-liter V-6, the base Camaro is nearly as powerful as the Mustang GT, and so we were champing at the bit to see what the Camaro could do in SS form, with a 6.2-liter V-8 stuffed under its hood.

How Quick Is It?

With the six-speed automatic, the Camaro SS can hit 60 mph in a scant 4.6 seconds, with the quarter-mile arriving in 13.1 at 109 mph. At 4.8 seconds, the Camaro with the six-speed manual takes 0.2 second longer to hit 60, but overtakes the automatic by the quarter-mile mark, clocking 13 seconds flat at 111 mph. (The L99 V-8 hooked to the automatic is rated for 400 hp and 410 lb-ft of torque, while the LS3/manual combo is good for 426 hp and 420 lb-ft.)

For comparison, both the 315-hp 2010 Ford Mustang GT and the 376-hp, 5.7-liter Hemi-powered Dodge Challenger R/T do the trick in 5.1 seconds. The better-matched but pricier Challenger SRT8—with a 425-horse, 6.1-liter Hemi—hits 60 in 4.8 seconds. So until Ford gets the Mustang GT into the gym and stuffs more power under its hood, Chevy has earned bragging rights in the segment where burliness arguably counts the most.

On a drive that took us along the scenic roads east of San Diego, California, we also found the Camaro’s roadholding to be quite stellar—it grips with 0.92 g on a skidpad—thanks in part to the independent multilink suspension out back and the stickiness of the fat, Z-rated 245/45 front and 275/40 rear tires mounted on 20-inch wheels. The variable-ratio steering rack delivers great on-center feel, similar to that which we’ve praised on the Camaro’s platform-mate, the Pontiac G8.












Quiet + Calm Ride = Surprising Comfort

The Camaro SS packs a few surprises, however. The engine is remarkably—and to some, disappointingly—quiet, at least from inside the cabin (based on the shell-shocked looks on the faces of people we blew by, it appears that it’s plenty loud on the outside).

For high-speed cruising, this is a good thing, as there is no shred of that exhausting boominess that can add misery to long-haul muscle-car motoring. But at the same time, we found ourselves wanting a bit more of an audible reminder that we were driving something with 426 freakin’ horses under the hood. Even at full tilt, the engine didn’t seem to have the trumpet-like blat of the Challenger R/T’s 5.7-liter, let alone the NASCAR-worthy howl of the 6.1-liter in the SRT8.

Another surprise is the eerily serene ride, which makes the quietness seem even quieter. Particularly at freeway speeds, the Camaro’s Zeta roots pay dividends, striking a brilliant balance between lively, grippy roadholding and wonderfully compliant damping. Meanwhile, the SS offers decent feedback through the steering wheel. A guy could cruise all day in this thing and never feel beat up.


















Drives Big

At higher speeds, however, is where one misses things like outward vision. The very low roof, high waistline, and wall-like rear pillars make the car drive big (not good for twisty two-laners), although the Challenger drives bigger yet.

Lane-changing is a point-and-squirt affair rather than anything involving an over-the-shoulder check. The exterior mirrors help, with the bonus that they give you a close-up view of the Camaro’s sexy hips. The interior mirror is utterly useless; all one sees when glancing rearward is an ocean of black roof and C-pillars the width of a Sequoia (the tree or the Toyota).

Also disappointing are the hard plastics that we had hoped were banished from GM interiors, but they’ve clearly found their way inside the Camaro.

Furthermore, the inset dashboard trim piece that was to be rendered—at least optionally—in a cool illuminated band of light-tube trickery has now become a cloth insert. And finally, as great as the high-mounted squircle-shaped gauges and cool center stack look, the script is tiny and the buttons can be ergonomically challenging in operation.
But the Camaro is beguiling.

It has a strong design, a strong heritage, and delivers seriously strong acceleration. It will do well with its established fan base, and should even earn a few more admirers in its new life.

And not insignificantly, the EPA just gave it excellent fuel-economy ratings. Could it be better? Absolutely, but at least its deficiencies involve its interior detailing more than its dynamics. Besides, in these tumultuous, unpredictable times, we should celebrate the mere fact that pony cars like this are here at all.

Welcome to the herd, little pony.

2010 BMW Z4 Road Test

Road Test: 2010 BMW Z4, which officially revealed at the 2009 North America Internationl Auto Show at Detroit. See details after the jump.

Two market segments in particular have been decimated by the Great Recession.

First, the Bentley-Ferrari-Porsche 911 area has effectively been castrated in the past six months.

Second, there are the smaller two-seater premium Euro roadsters we all love so well in the best of times: Porsche Boxster, Mercedes SLK, Audi TT Roadster, and BMW Z4. For these little guys, emasculation similes do not suffice.

BMW has slightly merciful timing on this new Z4. The last-generation coupe and roadster stopped production in Spartanburg right as the collapse was preparing to crush us all in July 2008. Now the new generation Z4 is cranking up in Regensburg, Germany, for a May 9th worldwide launch of deliveries just as a few signs are popping up that the start of the long bottoming-out could be upon us, bolstering at least a little confidence.

And we can all say bye-bye to the costly soft top and fixed top versions approach, since Munich decided a while ago that a folding hardtop covers all needs in this minor profit center segment. For this quickie drive review prior to the full story in next month’s Winding Road, we’ll focus on the key driving points and personality of the third-generation Z4 -- called the E89 internally by BMW.

Seeing the previous two Z4 roadsters sitting beside this new one pretty much tells the full story on how the car has altered its persona. In a modern way, the profile of the new Z4 is as beautiful to our eyes as that of the classic 507 or short-lived Z8.

The proportions are classic rakish Euro roadster with a clamshell-opening aluminum hood that is 5.5 inches longer than that on the last-gen Z4s. To the eye, this positions the two occupants much more to the rear axle though the wheelbase remains the same.

Then, given the packaging needs of the two-piece aluminum folding top, the shape of the rear end is raised a bit and it’s this line that ties it so closely to those classic proportions.

Then the front and rear ends are wider with light elements that emphasize this added width, a visual trick that is all the rage these days at every German builder. Thus, stared at from above, the footprint of the latest Z4 is basically rectangular as on most of the roadster bodies we lust after.

Inside, the form language carries over and everything is a little more generous and elegant than on the previous cars. Cockpit shoulder room is up almost an inch, elbow room by almost two inches, and these touches resolve one of the Z4’s old troubles: we felt hemmed in before and so the Z4 was never the choice for a longer distance drive.

This one stretches out a bit and matures up, thus attracting a different, possibly older, customer with more cash to play with. (The sDrive30i starts at $46,575 pre-tax with standard six-speed manual, the sDrive35i at $52,475.)

The only testers available in our Spanish try-out were top-of-the-line sDrive35i models with the new seven-speed dual-clutch Sport Auto transmission, though we did manage a quick try in a manually equipped 35i for you.

Both are terrific to be sure, but with the seven-speed we are miffed by the automated upshifts close to the 7000-rpm redline even in the Sport+ mode of the Drive Dynamic Control and kickdowns whenever we jam on it for overtaking.

This is a safety choice by BMW and it states clearly that this Z4 even at the top end is now meant for average drivers. Still, if you don’t mind anticipating the ECU police by 100 rpm or so, the shifting is swell and the exhaust sound is burly without being brash.

Playing with the new DDC -- normal, sport, sport+ -- also modifies the suspension and steering and the differences are more subtle than any previous mode system, but Sport+ is our overall choice especially if we find ourselves on these sensational roads above the Andalusian coast.

Our other favorite mode is roof down. The two-piece hardtop weighs 66 pounds more than the old ragtop, takes twenty seconds to open or close, and thankfully looks really good either open or shut.

2010 Porsche Panamera First Drive

The new Panamera is without doubt one of the two most controversial vehicles ever to come from Porsche, the other, of course, being the Cayenne. While traditional Porsche fans howled at the idea of an SUV coming from the "sportscar maker," this time around, the problem is not so much the premise of a four-door, four-passenger Porsche, but rather the car's styling.

Porsche is no stranger to controversy surrounding its new models. In fact, the German automaker seems to thrive on the divisiveness. Some of the cars that purists have complained about most bitterly have been among its best sellers. Much of the same whining heard about the Cayenne and Panamera accompanied the introduction of the front-engine, water-cooled 924 and 928 in the '70s, and to a lesser extent, even the transition of the 911 from air to water cooling.

The Panamera won't be shown publicly until the Shanghai Motor Show next month, but Porsche invited several dozen international media to its Weissach R&D center this week for a workshop on the technical details of the Panamera, and we were along for the ride. Read on to learn more about what makes the Panamera tick.

We've been seeing spy photos of the Panamera in camouflage for several years and Porsche released official photos in production form last November. When the production photos appeared, everyone's worst fears about the design seen in spy photos appeared to be true. Instead of the sleek, sloping roofline of competitors like the Mercedes CLS and upcoming Aston Martin Rapide, the Panamera had what looked like an ungainly hunchback.

Of course, Porsche has a long history of designing cars that wouldn't be considered beautiful in the classic sense. Instead, the Germans take the "form follows function" approach. That means engineers determine what they want the car to do and then the designers work around that brief. In this case, the result is that humpback shape on the back half of the car.

Back in the late 1980s, Porsche had plans to build a similar car dubbed the 989. That project was scrapped during the recession at the end of that decade, but the styling concept for that car showed a design that looked much more like the eventual 996 and 997 generation 911s. With a sloping roofline that resembled an elegant four-door 911, this was certainly more aesthetically pleasing. However, rear headroom was severely limited. This time around, Porsche wanted a true four-person grand touring car. Thus, the roofline stays high above the rear seats before dropping off at the back.


When we arrived in Weissach, we were taken straight to the Motorsports Hall. This is the building that normally serves as the final preparation and delivery facility for customers buying Porsche racing cars. During our visit, a row of 911 GT3 Cup cars sat outside the building alongside a trio of Panameras. We immediately swarmed over the new GTs and it was again apparent that the Panamera's design is not shown to best effect in photographs. It still isn't gorgeous in the 911 sense, but is far less homely in person than we imagined.

Climbing into the back seat, it's immediately apparent that the lumpy profile pays off with ample interior room for second row passengers. Compared to the BMW X6 (not a direct competitor, but an interesting comparison in this case), six-and-a-half footers should have no problem, with clearance available even when the sunroof is ordered. The healthy 115-inch span between the axles also means that the Panamera offers plenty of room for the long-legged, as well. After a few minutes checking out the Panamera, we were ushered inside to learn all about what was under the skin.


Porsche provided four tech sessions that we rotated through along with a taxi ride in the car on the track. We began by looking at the body structure. The 195.7-inch long Panamera is a large car, and like any other big, powerful luxury machine, it's packed with hardware and technology. As we've seen over the past two decades, such cars have gotten increasingly hefty with the likes of the Maserati Quattroporte approaching 5,000 pounds. Porsche engineers aimed to keep the Panamera's mass down to something more reasonable, and they seem to have largely succeeded.

The Panamera is certainly no lightweight, but at 3,903 pounds for the base rear-drive, normally aspirated 4.8-liter model, it's lighter than expected. Even the heaviest all-wheel-drive turbo version tips the scales at just 4,344 pounds. The engineers used a mix of aluminum, magnesium, plastic and several grades of steel for the body. Three quarters of the body-in-white mass, including the central portion of the body, is steel. Easily moldable deep drawn steel is used for the side panels and roof, while high strength steel is used for the side rails, rear structure and firewall, with the rest being a mix of multi-phase, stainless and boron steels.
The heavier, stronger steel was kept to areas predominantly within the wheelbase, where it is closer to the car's center of gravity. This helps minimize the Panamera's moment of inertia and aids handling. At the car's extremities, lighter aluminum and magnesium are used. The door structures, front and rear crush structures, front fenders and hood are all stamped, extruded or cast from the light alloy. Magnesium castings are also used for the side window frames and radiator mount.

Looking around the body structure, it becomes clear that engineers have made an effort to remove material wherever it doesn't contribute any function. One clear example is the sides of the engine compartment ahead of the front suspension mounting structure. A typical vehicle would have a solid metal stamping with a plastic wheel well liner bolted behind it. The Panamera just has the wheel liner. Similarly, the aluminum stampings in the doors have been laser cut to remove excess material that doesn't contribute to the structure.

The primary plastic body component is the rear wing, which rises up at speed. It lifts up at 55 mph and tilts to an angle of incidence of -3 degrees. That's enough to trim out the air flow and keep drag to a minimum. As speeds rise above 127 mph, the wing tilts up to a positive 10 degree angle to generate some downforce. Normally aspirated models get a single piece wing while the turbo gets a multi-piece unit. As the turbo wing rises, the upper surface lifts higher, splitting in the middle and extending outward for even more surface area.


Porsche didn't want the Panamera to generate huge amounts of downforce, since that would also increase drag, which they were trying to avoid. However, the turbo generates about 15 pounds of downforce at 155 mph, making it essentially neutral. The normally aspirated cars have a drag coefficient of 0.29, while the turbos come out the wind tunnel at 0.30.

Another area where Porsche has optimized mass is with the Panamera's climate control system. They have devised a four-zone climate control system that uses a single, central core system with ductwork going to each of the seating positions. A four quadrant sun load sensor mounted on the dash measures the angle and intensity of the solar load. This signal is fed into the climate control system to help make the control more efficient.

At launch, all Panameras will be powered by 4.8-liter V8s based on the Cayenne GTS motor. The engine can be had with or without turbochargers. Both engines get direct injection that helps improve power while reducing fuel consumption. The base version spins out 400 hp at 6,500 rpm and a healthy 369 lb-ft of torque from 3,500-5,000 rpm. The force-fed versions add a turbocharger to each exhaust manifold, which boosts the output to an even 500 hp. More importantly for fans of instant thrust, the torque goes to 516 lb-ft between 2,250 and 4,500 rpm.

European buyers will be able to opt for a six-speed manual gearbox on the rear-drive, normally aspirated model. All American Panamera drivers, as well as everyone that gets all-wheel drive or a turbo, will get the seven-speed PDK transmission. This is based on the same dual clutch transmission used in the 2009 911. All PDK-equipped Panameras (meaning all U.S. market cars) will also get an automatic start-stop system, the first automatic-equipped premium car so equipped.


Porsche's engineers have also done some interesting packaging tricks with the all-wheel-drive system. A so-called "hang-on" torque distribution unit is bolted to the back of the gearbox. This electronically controlled clutch pack sends the torque to the front or rear axles as needed. The front differential housing is bolted directly to the side of the block and oil sump. Since the differential doesn't move relative to the center clutch unit, the drive shaft doesn't need any universal joints. The intermediate shaft that crosses through the sump, from the front differential over to the left half shaft, passes a mere 1 mm below the crankshaft bearing cap.

On the lower, left-front side of the block is a variable-vane pump used for steering assist. The pump can be controlled to vary the flow as needed, helping to minimize parasitic losses. Porsche chose not to use electric power steering because the engineers were unable to achieve the steering feel they wanted at the cornering forces of which the Panamera is capable – a hydraulic system ended up providing a more natural feel to the steering.

Speaking of dynamic behavior, the Panamera has some very interesting hardware on board, as well. The suspension at both ends of the car is mounted to a rigid cast aluminum sub-frame that helps maintain the relative position of the corners to each other. The front axle uses upper and lower control arms with springs mounted concentrically with the damper. At the rear, multiple links manage the kinematics of the wheels and the springs are mounted separately from the dampers.

The standard configuration employs coil springs. Turbo models replace the coils with air springs that are also optionally available on the normally aspirated models. Each air spring has a valve that controls the volume of the spring. The valve is closed in Sports Plus mode, cutting off half the volume of the spring and increasing the effective spring rate. Activating the Sport switch on the center console tightens up the adaptive damping system, which uses additional accelerometers, curve inclination and wheel motion sensors to manage the dampers at each corner.


With the Porsche Dynamic Chassis Control, active anti-roll bars are included. Anti-roll bars are simply torsion bar springs tying the corners together with the body. The amount of body roll is managed by the spring rate of the bar. Actuators on both front and rear bars adjust the effective spring rates and, in combination with the adaptive damping and dual volume air springs, the Panamera can corner almost completely flat even at high lateral acceleration rates.

An important element of dynamic behavior is being able to dissipate speed. Here again, the Panamera seems to have the goods. All variants get mono-block calipers at all corners with six-piston units up front and four-pistons on the back. The non-turbos get 14.2-inch front and 13-inch rear steel rotors with the turbo upping those dimensions to a massive 15.4 and 13.8 inches. In typical Porsche fashion, buyers can also opt for the carbon ceramic composite rotors if they plan to drive their car particularly hard. In total, Porsche says its Panamera Turbo offers over 1,700 hp of braking power, so stopping consistently shouldn't be a problem.

Many high performance, all-wheel-drive cars are getting some form of torque vectoring these days that lets the drive system work in conjunction with stability control to help turn-in on corners. The PDCC system in the Panamera incorporates an electronically controlled rear differential. Under cornering forces, the differential can be variably locked, but it can't transfer drive torque to the outside wheel to help push the car around the corner like Acura's SH-AWD system. Instead, the inside rear brake is applied to send torque to the outer wheel.
For really serious drivers, Porsche is also offering the Sports Chrono package that adds a Sport Plus button. In addition to the tighter damping and air springs, this mode drops the whole body by 25 mm.

During the development of the Panamera, the body spent a lot of time in the wind tunnel with several goals in mind. Obviously, aerodynamic drag was one focus, but so was noise reduction. Since this is a luxury high performance car, Porsche wanted the interior to be quiet but still sporting. We were shown one of the wind tunnel clay models used to test various detail design elements. The model had dozens of surface mount microphones embedded in the clay which were used to measure the sound as air flowed over the body.

One of the main sources of audible wind noise in a car at speed is the airflow around the A-pillars and mirrors. The A-pillar of the clay model was easily replaceable and several of the examples were shown, each with a slightly different profile and, hence, a different sound profile. Another aspect of the body that contributed to drag and noise reduction was the underbody, which is completely enclosed on the Panamera. That's a first in this segment, according to Porsche.

The exhaust system engineers also spent plenty of time making sure that sounds that did get through were appropriate for a Porsche. Extensive nodal analysis of both the exhaust flow path and the components within the exhaust system were aimed at producing a deep bark when the car is pushed hard. It was emphasized that no artificial sounds were added to the mix, only the natural sounds of the V8 were allowed through.

Once we finished reviewing all of the Panamera's technology, it was time to go for a "taxi" ride. The Weissach development center has an excellent test track on which to exercise cars that features an array of different kinds of corners, elevation changes and surfaces. Outsiders won't be allowed to drive the Panamera until this summer, though we did have a chance to ride along with some of Porsche's top-notch test drivers. Three of us hopped into a Panamera along with a driver, which instantly highlighted the Panamera's most obvious strength.
Porsches have always been known for having great front seats. Aside from the Cayenne, the back seats in any other Porsche are probably best left simply folded down and forgotten, especially the 911. There is none of that 2+2 nonsense with the Panamera. This is a true four-seater offering rear seats that no one will consider punishment. They're fitting of a sporting car with real lateral support and plenty of space to stretch out. In fact, the 15.7-cu-ft of space under the rear hatch can easily accommodate four suitcases, meaning this could be a real four person road trip machine.
The rear seat backs can fold down 60/40 for those times when you need to pick up some flat pack furniture from IKEA. With both seats folded, the Panamera can accommodate 44.2 cu ft of stuff. For ski weekends, there is also a center pass through preserving both rear seats.

We started off on the track in Comfort mode as our turbo Panamera taxi roared off. Over rough pavement (still much better than typical Michigan roads), the Panamera maintained a remarkably smooth ride for a car with such high performance capability. Tracking through corners, there was some noticeable body roll in this mode. At the end of the first lap, the driver switched over to Sport Plus mode and then did a couple of hot laps.

For a 4,300-pound car with four adult males aboard, the Panamera felt like it was definitely capable of matching Porsche's performance claims of 0-62 mph in just 4.2 seconds. The Sport Plus mode snubbed out roll effectively and kept the body parallel to the ground while still not being too punishing. After a short break, we switched cars and seating positions and got into the back of a normally aspirated 4S.

Those who are susceptible to motion sickness may want to avoid sitting in the back seat of this car with a fast driver. It's not that the car does anything wrong – on the contrary, the capabilities are so high that the weak stomached will experience stronger forces than they are accustomed to. Fortunately, the back seats are up to the task and feel as good as the fronts.

The sensations we felt from the passenger positions of the Panamera definitely had us forgetting what the car's rear profile looks like. It wasn't until we climbed back out that the hunchback returned to mind, and by then it suddenly didn't look so bad. It's still not beautiful, but if we had $100,000 to drop in a quest for a really fast four-seater, this would certainly be on the list. We can't wait to try the Panamera from the driver's seat.

2010 Mercedes-Benz E-Class Road Test

Twelve million strong and growing, the E-Class is and has been the bread and butter of Mercedes-Benz's lineup.

This premium midsize sedan is set squarely between the company's compact C-Class and flagship S-Class, and Mercedes-Benz considers the all-new 2010 E-Class to be its most important new car of the year.

Over 22 million miles were logged during its testing—the company's most comprehensive development process to date—with the goal of making it the best E-Class yet. Did they get this one right? We spent a couple of days behind the wheel of the V8-powered E550 in Spain to find out.

The Specs
The E-Class's angular new skin creases sharply and has rounded rear haunches that resolve in geometric taillights which complement its squinty, faceted headlights. LED daytime running lights create a mean countenance and its form follows function as well: It boasts a slippery .25 drag coefficient.

Beneath the sheet metal, a steel unibody chassis has been modified to offer improved impact absorption and up to 30 percent more rigidity, thanks to new high-strength steel alloys. Adaptive shock absorbers adjust stiffness according to damping forces.

A new, electronically controlled Airmatic damping system comes standard in the E550 and E550 4Matic, and is available as an option on the V6 E350. Seats with additional foam filling and optional active and massaging functions (trickled down from the S-Class) offer more long-distance comfort.

Eleven standard airbags and the usual litany of electronic aids grace the new E-Class, as well as a lengthy list of high-tech safety features.

Like its predecessor, the E-Class includes the Pre-safe system, which optimizes seat belt tension and airbag actuation when an accident is imminent. Equipped with the optional Distronic radar-based cruise control, Brake Assist Plus uses two short-range radar sensors to detect distance from vehicles ahead and supplements brake pressure to help avoid collision.

Audible and visual warnings accompany the system's braking, and if the driver doesn't apply brakes and an accident is unavoidable, the system will apply full stopping power in order to reduce impact. Mercedes-Benz calls this its "digital crumple zone," and we think it makes a lot of sense.


The E-Class also inherits Blind Spot Assist from the S-Class, which lights up the side mirrors when a neighboring car occupies an area of the adjacent lane the driver cannot see. An audio warning engages if the turn signals are used and there's a car in the way.

The Lane Departure Warning system senses drifting across lanes and gently vibrates the steering wheel to alert the driver and a drowsiness detection system monitors more than 70 parameters including steering angle in order to pick up on clues that the driver is falling asleep.

If the vehicle decides the operator is too sleepy for safe driving, an audible warning chimes and a visual warning appears on the instrument panel. Night View Assist Plus is available as a stand-alone option and improves upon the system originally found in the E-Class's larger stablemate. Night View features clearer visuals and a pedestrian-detection function which highlights human-like shapes with bracket graphics.

The 2010 E350 and E550 sedans will be available this summer in Sport or Luxury configurations. The E350 will feature the 268-hp, 3.5-liter V6, while the E550 will be equipped with the 382-hp 5.5-liter V8. Expect all-wheel-drive 4Matic and the steroidal E63 AMG to arrive later this year, while a 50-state E350 Bluetec diesel is expected by early 2010.



The Drive
We were impressed the moment we climbed into our E550: its tony leather and matte wood-lined cabin is much improved over the outgoing model. It is a serene driving environment. Equipped with the optional leather-lined dashboard, the more angular interior feels ergonomic yet upscale, and the knurled controller is surrounded by function buttons that make it easier to use.

There are just enough controls on the dash to ease functionality without cluttering up the expanses of leather, aluminum, and wood.

The steering-wheel-mounted shifter frees up space on the center console, and when the E-Class gets rolling the driver is met with reassuring feedback. Acceleration is smooth with strong pull in the middle and upper rpm ranges, but in Sport mode, the transmission doesn't shift as aggressively as you might expect.

With an emphasis on comfort and predictability, the E550 seems more concerned with consistency than it does with outright performance. There's enough steering feel to inspire confident maneuvering, though some German rivals offer a bit more of those important communicative sensations enthusiasts enjoy.

But there's plenty to like with the E550; it feels composed, and the seven-speed automatic makes the most of the V8's engine output. Ride quality is generally supple, though larger bumps and potholes upset the chassis more than we expected. In keeping with traditional Mercedes-Benz sedans, the E550 maintains reassuring road manners paired with a luxurious cabin.

Using Night Vision during an evening drive revealed a clear, stutter-free picture of the road ahead. Black cutouts of human silhouettes were placed by the roadside, and the system quickly identified them and tracked their shapes as we passed. This is an impressive safety feature—one we first experienced on the new BMW 7 Series.
On our evening drive we were impressed by the headlamps too—Adaptive headlights turn to follow the road and will dim high beams when cars approach from the opposite direction.

In addition to the E550, we also sampled the Europe-only, manual-transmission E200 CGI BlueEfficiency with direct injection that won't be coming to the U.S. because, Mercedes says, of incompatible gasoline standards. And that's a shame. This model is estimated to yield up to 38 mpg.

We also took a sneak peek at the fire-breathing AMG E63, which promises to assuage drivers who find the E350 and E550 models just a little too pedestrian for their lead-footed needs.
The Bottom Line
The new E-Class is a crucial car for Mercedes-Benz, and it comes at a time when consumers are focused more on core values, rather than flash or ostentatious one-upmanship.

Thanks to its plusher interior and level-headed on-road demeanor, the new E-Class may steal some comfort-oriented BMW 5 Series owners. And when the new E63 rolls around, you can bet the thrill-seeking contingency will be equally impressed.

2010 BMW M3 of Brabham Racing BT92 Road Test


We'll get to the driving hilarity in a second. After all, the stunning 494-horsepower, 2010 Brabham Racing BT92 is based on the stunning 414-hp 2010 BMW M3 Coupe, so it's automatically a thrill and a half.


There's a lot of intrigue surrounding this car, labeled the Brabham Racing BT92 by its creator, Michael Trick. You might remember Jack Brabham, the three-time Formula 1 driving champion, who had nothing to do with this car and is monumentally p.o.'ed (in the form of his sons, IMSA racing champion Geoff and ALMS racing champion David) at this co-opting of the family name by some German upstart. And BMW itself was a little miffed over this new company's impetuous use of the BMW badge on one of its early Web sites, as if this were a BMW-certified project.

So we've had our doubts about this non-Brabham Brabham Racing BT92 thing ever since the car appeared last fall at the 2008 Essen Motor Show, Germany's equivalent of SEMA. But it turns out that the Brabham family had not nailed down any rights to the Brabham trademarks worldwide in recent years, so they were fair game. And that thing with the Web site and the BMW roundel was resolved when company owner Trick ordered the site killed.

Driving and touching and feeling tells the ultimate story about this ultimate M3. And the 2010 Brabham Racing BT92 is tremendous from the driver seat. Despite all that has been altered, however, it still basically looks pretty close to an M3, and we immediately wonder, therefore, about the plausibility of its asking price of nearly $310,000.

Having the Best Costs Dough
Once we sat down with Brabham Racing's Michael Trick and other members of his team in southern Spain, we gradually came around to seeing the 2010 BMW M3 by Brabham Racing for what it is: a really ambitious piece of work that any driving enthusiast will be proud to own (if they can afford it, of course).

The people behind this thing are peerless. All engine work to the 4.0-liter BMW S65B40 V8 over the past two years has been handled in an exclusive deal with longtime BMW engineering pro Oliver Nowack, whose father was mentor to "Camshaft" Paul Rosche, himself the father of BMW Formula 1 racing engines. Technical chief to the Brabham Racing project is Andreas Hainke, the former tech boss of Volkswagen Motorsport.

The BT92's M3 engine has been upgraded to racing specification in almost every respect. The dimensions of the cylinders are now 93.3mm-by-80.2mm against the original 4.0-liter V8's 92.0mm-by-75.2mm, yielding a displacement of 4.4 liters.

A forged crankshaft has been carefully balanced and the camshaft profiles are new, while the cylinder heads have been machined for bigger valves and the pistons have been given a low-friction coating. Naturally, the all-new intake and exhaust systems have been optimized for more power, some 494 hp at 8,300 rpm and 354 pound-feet of torque at 5,700 rpm.

Another aspect to the expensive, 20-day process that converts an ordinary 2010 BMW M3 to the Brabham Racing BT92 is the use of a full complement of carbon-fiber body panels (the M3 roof panel remains, of course). The result of all the carbon fiber is added structural rigidity, together with a weight loss of 110 pounds in the body alone.

The engine can still be serviced at any BMW-certified shop, and it's still compatible with the existing six-speed manual gearbox The standard M3's factory-estimated 4.5-second dash to 60 mph is improved by the BT92 to 4.1 seconds (3.9 seconds with the latest dual-clutch GK gearbox that's being developed as an option, we're told), though the real leap forward in performance comes at higher speeds. Now that the electronic speed limiter has been disabled, the new engine's redline of 8,550 rpm allows a v-max of 188 mph.

Sound and Color
We accentuated our driving experience by keeping the Power button lit most of the time for the full 494-hp output. Even with it unlit, though, the customized dual-tip exhaust system developed in collaboration between Brabham Racing's Nowack and exhaust experts Stüber is a bleeding cannon. Stüber has specialized for years in making those motorcycle exhausts that drive people in gated communities nuts, so the bark of this exhaust over 2,500 rpm sounds like the wrath of engineering being visited on Mother Nature. That is, it's pretty damned loud. When we said this to Trick, he answered, "Yeah, actually it's not yet quite loud enough."

This is a reminder that the Brabham Racing BT92 is not a BMW Alpina exercise in padded refinement and effortless momentum. Brabham Racing wants to, well, race.

As we were photographing the BT92 (the name is simply the conflation of the traditional Brabham "BT" racing designation with the BMW's E92 model label) among the hills of Andalusia, the car's Brabham Blue exterior played visually entertaining games with the light or lack thereof.

At one moment in the hard, low winter sun, the car was screaming bright blue. The next moment, some cloud cover transformed it into a deep, dark, bruised blue. Bernd Paetz, the project's paint expert, refused to divulge the paint code for this magic job, but all Brabham Racing cars will wear it.

Better Than an M3?
For all that money and paint and fury and emotion, is the BT92 really better than an M3? Yes, it is. It freakin' well better be. Fifty buyers total (that's the production run for this limited edition) are bound to find this out, too.

The six-speed manual transmission really seems suited to this lighter, more hard-core version of the M3. With the factory 2010 BMW M3, we prefer the effortless action of the dual-clutch seven-speed transmission and its shift paddles, yet we had a brilliant time slicing and dicing the empty two-lanes all over this part of Spain, with our right arm getting a workout and the gears engaging like buttah.

Weight transfer while slaloming between rock outcroppings is really quick and crisp, as the adjustable coil-over dampers are very nicely calibrated to the BT92, which weighs 330 pounds less at the curb compared to the conventional M3.

These wild two-piece, forged 19-inch wheels (one-piece versions are promised soon) with their nonfunctional dabs of carbon-fiber veneer are a little over the top, but the added feel they deliver to the steering wheel cannot be denied.

The 10-inch-wide front rims wear 265/35R19 tires and the 12-inch rear rims carry 315/30R19 rubber, both of the Dunlop Sport Maxx GT persuasion. Brabham Racing also creates its own high-performance brake sets, and the BT92's floating calipers stop things better than the standard Bimmer items.

It's not a full interior job in the BT92, but we did feel the pleasures of the reupholstered blue seats and thick-rim steering wheel. The high-bolstered sport seats are naturally very supportive, and that always helps things during the wilder moments of rural road racing.

What's the Point, Really?
Much in keeping with the hard-bitten perfectionism of those two racing characters from Australia, Sir Jack Brabham and Ron Tauranac (the "B" and "T" in all the BT designations), Michael Trick and his band of Nürburgring merrymakers have a lot personally invested in this deal. "We could have easily just dropped a V10 BMW engine into the front of this like everyone else does," says Trick, "but our point is to create truly deep and expert engineering statements."

Again in keeping with some of the old Brabham mojo, Trick tells us that the real inspiration for the entire project came, he says, from "falling in love with the BT52 F1 car in 1983 when I was younger and being really moved by the sound of the BMW turbocharged engines in the Gordon Murray chassis back when Bernie Ecclestone owned the team."

This is a valid point made with some honesty, and it's crucial to the BT92's future. In fact, Brabham Racing intends to break the lap record at the Nürburgring Nordschleife for modified production cars, set at 7:20 by a 2009 Dodge Viper ACR last summer.

It will be done with the Clubsport version of the 2010 Brabham Racing BT92, which has been the real goal of the little company's whole M3 project.

In fact, Michael Trick wants to take Brabham Racing into real motorsport with a team of BMWs in the World Touring Car championship and even one day (why not dream big), a team of BMWs for the DTM in a collaboration between Brabham Racing, Alpina and Schnitzer.

A Brabham car in racing again? That sounds good.

Article Source:http://horisly.blogspot.com/2009/03/2010-bmw-m3-of-brabham-racing-bt92-road.html